Seismotectonics of the Romanian Vrancea area
F. Wenzel, F. Lorenz, B. Sperner and M.C. Oncescu
Geophysical Institute
University of Karlsruhe
Hertzstr. 16
76187 Karlsruhe
Germany
Figures not available
Introduction
The seismicity of the Romanian Vrancea area has peculiar features: (1) strong
earthquakes occur at intermediate depths in a very narrow source volume; (2)
the seismogenic zone is situated beneath continental crust, at the SE corner of
the highly arcuate Carpathian arc; (3) no evidence for active ongoing
subduction is found today. Several geophysical models were developed that tried
to provide an explanation for the localization of seismicity at depth (Fuchs
et al., 1979; Oncescu, 1984; Tavera, 1991). They contain ideas on
interaction of a
paleo-subduction zone with more recent subduction and include initial concepts
of slab break-off. In recent years new facts and concepts came up that merit a
re-evaluation of the tectonic scenarios related to Vrancea seismicity.
Rollback of the Carpathian subduction zone (e.g. Royden, 1988) into an
oceanic embayment of the European foreland was accompanied by steepening of the
subducting lithosphere which resulted in slab segmentation (i.e. fractures
within the slab extending along dip separated the slab into small pieces). Due
to oblique convergence between the intra Carpathian microplates and the European
foreland asynchronous continental collision occurred starting in the north, in
the Western Carpathians, during middle Miocene (16 Ma) and ending in the
Southeast, in the Carpathians, during late Miocene (10 Ma; Jiricek,
1979). In the same manner, post collisional slab break off started in the
north and migrated towards the south(east), so that one slab segment after the
other was detached and sank into the lower mantle (Sperner, 1996).
Beneath the Vrancea
region the last of these segments, which is still attached or just about to
detach, gives rise for the spatially limited occurrence of seismicity. The
post-collisional history of oceanic lithosphere has become a major research
topic (Wortel and Spakman, 1992; Davies and von Blankenburg, 1995) with
the result that slabs might detach. Additional physical insight comes from
estimates of the deformation rate of the source volume, from recent tomographic
results and from models of stress distribution within a passive slab. This
paper presents these facts and their implications for Vrancea tectonics.
Characteristics of Vrancea Seismicity
The seismicity of the Vrancea region in the SE Carpathians is characterized by
the occurrence of intermediate depth earthquakes in an amazingly narrow
epicentral and hypocentral region. The epicentral area is confined to about 30
x 70 km (Fig. 1). Earthquakes occur between 70 and 200 km depth within an
almost vertical column. Deeper and shallower events have been recorded but only
with small magnitudes. Depth and estimated moment magnitude (Mw) of all
instrumentally recorded events are summarized in Figure 2 from Oncescu and
Bonjer (1997). The depth interval of the strong events is bounded by levels
of low seismicity between 40 and 60 km and beneath 180 km. The Mw = 3.7 event
clearly represents an exception. The ruptured areas jump from 150 - 180 km
(1940, Mw = 7.7) to 90 - 110 km (1977, Mw = 7.5) to 130 - 150 km (1986, Mw =
7.2) to 70 - 90 km (1990, Mw = 6.9). The depth interval between 110 and 130 km
remained unruptured possibly since the last 150 years. This depth is a natural
candidate for the next strong Vrancea event.
All events occur in a compressive regime with thrust tectonics at intermediate
depth. The fault plane solutions of the instrumentally recorded large
earthquakes are remarkably similar. They typically strike SW-NE (~ 220°) and
dip 60° to 70° to the NW. The slip angle is roughly 90°. The similarity of the
fault plane solutions is strongly contrasting with significant variations of the
radiation patterns which reflect the dynamics of the rupture process. The
intensively studied 1977 event (Müller et al., 1978, Rökers and
Müller, 1982) is characterized by a sequence of shocks that propagated
to the SW, enhancing radiation in this direction. In agreement with this
seismological result the
damage was more severe to the SW of Vrancea as compared to the NE. This
contrasts the damage pattern of the stronger 1940 event which caused less
damage in Bucharest than the weaker 1977 earthquake.
The frequency of Vrancea events can be assessed from available catalogues.
Earthquakes with Richter magnitudes in excess of 6.0 taken from Radu's
(1991) compilation covering this century and transformed to moment
magnitudes with Oncescu's (1987) relation satisfy a Gutenberg/Richter
law (Lungu and Coman, 1994):
with N as the number of events per year with magnitudes larger or equal to Mw.
This provides recurrence times of 10 years for Mw > 6.5, 25 years for Mw > 7.0
and 50 years for Mw > 7.4. Historical data have been compiled by Radu
(1974) and Purcaru (1979). Assuming that the data are complete for
large magnitudes for
the last 600 years, this time interval shows 3 earthquakes/century with Mw >
7.2 and 6 events/century with Mw > 6.8 in good agreement with the result based
on relation (1).
An estimation of the seismic moment release rate (Mo) is a useful quantity to
compare the level of seismic activity between different seismotectonic areas.
The Gutenberg/Richter relation (1) and an assumed maximum possible magnitude of
Mw = 8.0 result in Mo = Nm/yr. This represents
the average amount of
seismic moment per year released by Vrancea earthquakes and is proportional to
the elastic energy release rate. Almost the same result is achieved if we add
the seismic moments of the 4 last strong events (1940, 1977, 1986, 1990) which
according to Oncescu and Bonjer (1997) amount to 7.5 ( 1020 Nm and
divide it by a period of 100 years.
Table 1 compares the moment release rate of Vrancea with those of several active
plate boundary regions (Jackson and McKenzie, 1988; Ward, 1994). The
moment release rates of the Aegean and N-Anatolian Fault region exceed the
Vrancea value by a factor of 3. However, the latter is comparable to Southern
California and twice as high as values of the Zagros mountains and the
Caucasus.
TABLE 1: Comparison of moment release rates for various
tectonic active areas of the Mediterranean and the Middle East
(after Jackson and McKenzie, 1988).
| Region | |
| Aegean | 2.5
|
| N-Anatolian Fault | 2.3
|
| Kopet Dag | 1.5
|
| Vrancea | 1.0
|
| Zagros | 0.4
|
| Caucasus | 0.3
|
Moment release rates can be cast in strain rates with Kostrov's (1974)
relation between moment and strain tensors. Taking the moment tensors of the
last 4 large Vrancea earthquakes (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997), a source
volume of 2.5·105 km³ (70×30×130 km) and a mantle shear
modulus of 7.5· Pa gives a
strain rate of e = 2·10. With this strain rate the source volume is
stretched in the vertical direction and shortened in NW-SE direction. Again
this strain rate compares well with values from active plate boundaries such as
Southern California (Ward, 1994; Fig. 3) where a similar amount of
strain is
observed by geodetic means. We elaborate this point in order to show that
Vrancea seismicity, given its seismic moment release and associated strain
rates, is at plate boundary scale. The estimated strain rate deforms a vertical
slab with 130 km length by 2.6 cm/yr in vertical direction. Upscaling of this
value to a geological times provides a value of 26 km vertical elongation in one
million years.
Mantle Structure from Seismic Tomography
Several tomographic studies of the Vrancea zone have been conducted. Spakman
et al. (1993) derived an image of the entire Mediterranean area including
SE-Europe. This image reveals such important features as the phenomenon of slab
detachment in the Tyrrhenian Sea (Wortel and Spakman, 1992). Weak
indications
of slab detachment are also visible for the Carpathian Arc. As standard ISC
stations and data are used, the resolution of local features remains limited.
Oncescu et al. (1984) inverted teleseismic events recorded by the
Romanian
earthquake network. A low-velocity structure could be identified between 40 and
80 km depth. The results of simultaneous inversion of hypocenters and P-wave
velocities (Oncescu, 1984; Koch, 1985) indicate high-velocity material
between
80 and 160 km depth, the level where intermediate depth seismicity is located.
A recent attempt by Fan et al. (1998) with a larger set of regional
earthquakes
and records confirms that the intermediate depth seismogenic volume is
characterized by high velocities.
Lorenz et al.(1997) restricted the input data used for inversion of
teleseismic
tomography to those stations of the Romanian network with digital recording.
Though the number of stations are thus reduced as compared to Oncescu et al.
(1984) the results are more significant due the improved data quality.
Figure 3
shows depth levels of 74 to 112 km (Fig. 3a), 112 to 152 km (Fig. 3b), and 152
to 194 km (Fig. 3c). Each panel contains the sites of digital stations as
triangles. The hypocenters of small earthquakes as observed during 1980 and
1994 are marked as dots and the sites of the large events between 1940 and 1990
as crosses. Both the pattern of stations and the azimuthal distribution of
teleseismic earthquakes limit the volume that is illuminated by seismic rays
and the resolution of the inversion. Given these constraints we consider the
following features as significant:
The images show blocks of low velocities (- 4%), which surround an area of
higher velocity (+ 4%) The high velocities extend from a subcrustal depth of 40
km all the way down to the maximum depth of 236 km mapped during inversion. The
recent inversion of local events (Fan et al., 1998) shows results
consistent with this observation. At intermediate depth the elevated velocities
appear only beneath Vrancea.
All intermediate depth earthquakes are contained in the high-velocity volume.
It appears that the seismogenic volume is significantly smaller as compared to
the high-velocity volume. The earthquakes occupy a small strip within the
high-velocity body that tends from the NE at a level around 90 km (Fig. 3a) to
the SW at the level where the deepest earthquakes are observed. It is also
noteworthy that no specific velocity structure within the limits of resolution
characterizes the depth level of very low seismicity (40 to 70 km) and the
depths below the deepest events. On a global scale all images of active
subduction zones are characterized by positive P-wave velocity anomalies. We
take this as strong evidence for the presence of a slab of oceanic lithosphere
beneath Vrancea.
The volume of elevated velocities displays a peculiar structure, the main
feature of which is a change of strike from top to bottom. The uppermost high
velocity material has a strike direction roughly SW-NE. This is consistent with
a NW-ward subduction. The deeper portions of the high-velocity material,
however, are oriented S-N. This direction is close to the current strike of the
Eastern Carpathians. Presumably this is also the strike direction of subduction
before the last segment of lithosphere - the Vrancea segment - was incorporated
into the mantle. Thus the directional change of subduction during the last
phases of collision in the Eastern Carpathians is preserved in the tomographic
image. The S-N oriented high-velocity material represents older W-ward
subducted material that is detached from the foreland lithosphere but still
attached to the SW-NE trending Vrancea slab. This additional portion of heavy
oceanic lithosphere generates a pull-down force which will increase shear
stresses in this passive slab.
4. Stress Field in a Passive Slab
Geological evidence suggests that active subduction around the Carpathian arc
ceased about 10 Million years ago. When subduction came to a halt the slab
steepened to an almost vertical position. Thus the simplest model to estimate
the stress field within this chunk of lithosphere is a rectangular block of
high-density material (rho(s)), attached to a rigid layer that may represent
the effective elastic lithosphere underlain by a low-density (rho(m)) mantle.
The horizontal stress (rho(h)) equals the lithostatic pressure of the
surrounding mantle, whereas the vertical stress (sigma(v)) equals the
lithostatic pressure within the slab reduced by the buoyancy effect:
sigma(h) = rho(m)·g·z (2a)
sigma(v) = rho(s)·g·z - (rho(s)- rho(m))·g·L (2b)
with a total slab length L, gravitational acceleration g and depth z.
Within the slab the stress field changes from tensile at shallow depth z < L.
(rho(s)-rho(m))/rho(s) to compressive at deeper levels. As this model is rather crude
for shallow levels we focus on those depths that are relevant to intermediate
seismicity. With (m = 3200 kg/m³, (s = 3400 kg/m³, g = 10 m/s² and L = 200 km
the stresses are compressive below 12 km depth. The buoyancy effect amounts to
0.4 GPa, so that the maximum differential stress decreases from 0.4 GPa to zero
at the lower end of the slab where lithostatic conditions prevail. Thus this
simple model is consistent with the stress field suggested by the fault plane
solutions. However, the maximum possible shear stress remains on a fairly low
level at the seismogenic depths between 70 (260 MPa) and 200 km (no shear
stress).
If we assume that the seismogenic volume differs from the high-density volume
such that there are parts of the slab that extend below the deepest level of
seismicity more realistic parameters apply. With an additional 150 km of
non-seismic slab the level of maximum possible shear stress exceeds 300 MPa
everywhere within the seismogenic volume. Although the frictional strength of
rocks under very high confining pressure (5 GPa) are not known, estimates of
lithosphere strength using plate bending geometry (Goetze and Evans, 1979)
indicate that this level of shear stress may be sufficient to rupture oceanic
lithosphere.
5. Implications for Hazard Assessment
Understanding the tectonics of the Vrancea earthquakes is mandatory for
improving hazard assessment. The sequence of large events with their specific
distribution of rupture areas has been shown in Figure 2. It is tempting to
suggest that the next strong event would rupture the depth level around 120 km.
However, this argument implicitly uses the model of a fault consisting of
various segments that break one after another. For large strike slip faults
such as the San Andreas or the North Anatolian fault this seems to be true and
has been utilized for hazard assessment. The essential idea is that the
probability that a segment of the fault breaks is dependent upon the last time
it ruptured. This is a deviation from the standard assumption of earthquake
occurrence, which assumes a Poisson distribution of the events within a given
time interval. A Poisson statistics is justified if the events are independent.
The probability of occurrence of an earthquake between now and a given time in
the future is then independent on the previous seismic history. For a large
seismogenic area this may be a viable assumption. It has been questioned,
however, for specific faults, whose magnitude distribution deviates from the
standard Gutenberg/Richter law and can be better described by characteristic
earthquakes.
If the high-velocity material is interpreted as the volume within which brittle
failure could occur, the spatial extent of this volume simultaneously limits
the maximum size of earthquakes. Wells and Coppersmith (1994) developed
an empirical relation between moment magnitude and the size of the fault
plane
with rupture area A in km². The variance of Mw in this estimate amounts to
( = 0.24. A comparison of observed values of A (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997)
and those
derived from relation (3) compare favorably (Table 1), so that (3) can be
applied to large Vrancea earthquakes. Table 2 shows the prediction of fault
plane sizes and their linear dimension ()
taken as square root. Obviously
an event with magnitude Mw = 8.5 would not fit onto the high-velocity volume,
so that tomography suggests that the maximum possible earthquake is in the
range of Mw = 8.0
TABLE 2: Magnitude (Mw) versus rupture area (A in km²) according to
observations of the large Vrancea events (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997)
compared with the areas predicted by the empirical relation (3).
is the square root of the area and
represents the scale of the linear dimension of the ruptured area.
| year | | A (observed)
| A (W&C) | (W&C)
|
| 1940
| 7.7
| 2500
| 3300
| 57
|
| 1977
| 7.4
| 2000
| 1750
| 42
|
| 1986
| 7.1
| 725
| 930
| 30
|
| 1990
| 6.9
| 300
| 610
| 25
|
TABLE 3. Rupture areas (A in km²) and their linear dimensions
( in km) are predicted by the empirical
relation (3) for large moment magnitudes (Mw).
| | A
|
|
| 7.5
| 2200
| 50
|
| 8.0
| 6200
| 80
|
| 8.5
| 18600
| 140
|
6. Conclusions
The intermediate depth of Vrancea seismicity is characterized by a seismic
moment release rate of 0.8· Nm/yr and a
strain rate of 2·.
These values are comparable with data from Southern California and indicate
that energy release and deformation are of plate boundary scale. Previous and
recent seismic tomography show that the seismicity is confined to a
high-velocity region of the mantle. Both facts together are taken as evidence
that seismicity is related to oceanic subduction. As active subduction ceased
several million years ago the ongoing process of upper mantle deformation must
be controlled by post-collisional slab dynamics such as slab segmentation and
detachment. The seismologically observed stress field within the seismogenic
zone is consistent with these considerations.
References
Davies, J. H., and von Blanckenburg, F. (1995): Slab breakoff: A
model of lithosphere detachment and its test in the magmatism and
deformation of collisional orogens, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
129, 85-102.
Fan, G., Wallace, T.C., and Zhao, D. (1998): Tomographic imaging of
deep velocity structure beneath the Eastern and Southern Carpathians,
Romania: implications for continental collision, J. Geophys. Res.
103(B2), 2701-2723.
Goetze, Ch., and Evans, B. (1979): Stress and temperature in the
bending lithosphere as constrained by experimental rock mechanics,
Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 59, 463-478.
Jackson, J., and McKenzie, D. (1988): The relationship between plate
motion and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in
the Mediterranean and Middle East, Geophysical Journal 93, 45-73.
Jiricek, R. (1979): Tectonic development of the Carpathian arc in the
Oligocene and Neogene, in: M. Mahel (ed.), Tectonic Profiles through
the Western Carpathians, Geol. Inst. Dionyz Stur, Bratislava, 205-214.
Koch, M. (1985): Nonlinear inversion of local seismic travel times
for the simultaneous determination of the 3D-velocity structure and
hypocentres - application to the seismic zone Vrancea, J. Geophys. 56,
160-173.
Kostrov, V (1974): Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and
seismic flow of rocks, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys., Solid Earth 1,
23-44.
Lorenz, F.P., Wenzel, F., and Popa, M. (1997): Teleseismic
travel-time tomography of the compressional-wave velocity structure in the
Vrancea zone, Romania, Abstract, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco,
USA.
Lungu, A., and Coman, O. (1994): Experience database of Romanian
facilities subjected to the last three Vrancea earthquakes. Part I:
Probabilistic hazard analysis to the Vrancea earthquakes in Romania,
Research Report for the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna,
Austria, Contract No. 8223/EN.
Müller, G., Bonjer, K.-P., Stöckl, H., and Enescu, D. (1978):
The Romanian earthquake of March 4, 1997. I. Rupture process inferred
from fault-plane solutions and multiple-event analysis, J. Geophys. 44,
203-218.
Oncescu, M.C. (1984): Deep structure of Vrancea region, Romania,
inferred from simultaneous inversion for hypocenters and 3-D velocity
structure, Ann. Geophys. 2, 23-28.
Oncescu, M.C. (1987): On the magnitude and depth recurrence of
Vrancea earthquakes, Report ICEFIZ EP-34-1987, 20 p. (in Romanian).
Oncescu, M.C., Bulacu, V., Anghel, M., and Smalbergher, V. (1984):
Three-dimensional P-wave velocity image under the Carpathian Arc,
Tectonophysics 106, 305-319.
Oncescu, M.C., and Bonjer, K.-P. (1997): A note on the depth
recurrence and strain release of large Vrancea earthquakes,
Tectonophysics 272, 2-4, 291-302.
Oncescu, M.C., Marza, I.V., Rizescu, M., and Popa, M. (1998): The
Romanian earthquake catalogue between 984-1996, this volume.
Purcaru, G. (1979): The Vrancea, Romania, earthquake of March 4, 1977
- a quite successful prediction, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 18,
274-287.
Radu, C. (1974): Contribution à l'étude de la séismicité de la
Roumanie et comparaison avec la séismicité de sud-est de la France,
Ph.D.-thesis, Université de Strasbourg, 404p.
Radu, C. (1991): Strong earthquakes occurred on the Romanian
territory in the period 1901-1990, Vitralii 3, 12-13 (in Romanian).
Rökers, E., and Müller, G. (1982): The Romanian earthquake of
March 4, 1977. III. Improved focal model and moment determination, J.
Geophys. 50, 143-150.
Royden, L. (1988): Late Cenozoic tectonics of the Pannonian basin
system, Tectonics 12, 2, 303-325.
Spakman, W., van der Lee, S., and van der Hilst, R. (1993):
Travel-time tomography of the European-Mediterranean mantle down to 1400
km, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 79, 3-14.
Sperner, B. (1996): Computer programs for the kinematic analysis of
brittle deformation structures and the Tertiary tectonic evolution of the
Western Carpathians (Slovakia), Tübinger Geowiss. Arbeiten A 27,
120p.
Tavera, I. (1991): Etude des mecanismes focaux de gros seismes et
sismicité dans la region de Vrancea-Romania. Raport stage DEA de
geophysique interne, Institut de Physique du Globe, Université de
Paris 7, 53p.
Ward, S.N. (1994): A multidisciplinary approach to seismic hazard in
Southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. America 84, 5, 1293-1309.
Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, K.J. (1994): New empirical
relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area
and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc America 84, 4,
974-1002.
Wortel, M.J.R., and Spakman, W. (1992): Structure and dynamics of
subducted lithosphere in the Mediterranean region, Proc. Kon. Ned.
Akad. v. Wetensch. 95, 3, 325-347.
Figures: (müssen in den Text integriert werden)
- Figure 1. Topographic map of Romania with intermediate depth seismicity
(> 60 km) of this century (for details see Oncescu et al., this volume).
- Figure 2. Depth and magnitude of the last 4 large Vrancea earthquakes.
- Figure 3. Horizontal slices of upper mantle between 74 km and 194 km depth
of the Vrancea area. Note that all recorded seismicity (dots and crosses)
is confined to the high-velocity areas.
M. Pohl, Feb 19, 1999