Seismotectonics of the Romanian Vrancea area


F. Wenzel, F. Lorenz, B. Sperner and M.C. Oncescu

Geophysical Institute
University of Karlsruhe
Hertzstr. 16
76187 Karlsruhe
Germany


Figures not available

Introduction

The seismicity of the Romanian Vrancea area has peculiar features: (1) strong earthquakes occur at intermediate depths in a very narrow source volume; (2) the seismogenic zone is situated beneath continental crust, at the SE corner of the highly arcuate Carpathian arc; (3) no evidence for active ongoing subduction is found today. Several geophysical models were developed that tried to provide an explanation for the localization of seismicity at depth (Fuchs et al., 1979; Oncescu, 1984; Tavera, 1991). They contain ideas on interaction of a paleo-subduction zone with more recent subduction and include initial concepts of slab break-off. In recent years new facts and concepts came up that merit a re-evaluation of the tectonic scenarios related to Vrancea seismicity.

Rollback of the Carpathian subduction zone (e.g. Royden, 1988) into an oceanic embayment of the European foreland was accompanied by steepening of the subducting lithosphere which resulted in slab segmentation (i.e. fractures within the slab extending along dip separated the slab into small pieces). Due to oblique convergence between the intra Carpathian microplates and the European foreland asynchronous continental collision occurred starting in the north, in the Western Carpathians, during middle Miocene (16 Ma) and ending in the Southeast, in the Carpathians, during late Miocene (10 Ma; Jiricek, 1979). In the same manner, post collisional slab break off started in the north and migrated towards the south(east), so that one slab segment after the other was detached and sank into the lower mantle (Sperner, 1996). Beneath the Vrancea region the last of these segments, which is still attached or just about to detach, gives rise for the spatially limited occurrence of seismicity. The post-collisional history of oceanic lithosphere has become a major research topic (Wortel and Spakman, 1992; Davies and von Blankenburg, 1995) with the result that slabs might detach. Additional physical insight comes from estimates of the deformation rate of the source volume, from recent tomographic results and from models of stress distribution within a passive slab. This paper presents these facts and their implications for Vrancea tectonics.


Characteristics of Vrancea Seismicity

The seismicity of the Vrancea region in the SE Carpathians is characterized by the occurrence of intermediate depth earthquakes in an amazingly narrow epicentral and hypocentral region. The epicentral area is confined to about 30 x 70 km (Fig. 1). Earthquakes occur between 70 and 200 km depth within an almost vertical column. Deeper and shallower events have been recorded but only with small magnitudes. Depth and estimated moment magnitude (Mw) of all instrumentally recorded events are summarized in Figure 2 from Oncescu and Bonjer (1997). The depth interval of the strong events is bounded by levels of low seismicity between 40 and 60 km and beneath 180 km. The Mw = 3.7 event clearly represents an exception. The ruptured areas jump from 150 - 180 km (1940, Mw = 7.7) to 90 - 110 km (1977, Mw = 7.5) to 130 - 150 km (1986, Mw = 7.2) to 70 - 90 km (1990, Mw = 6.9). The depth interval between 110 and 130 km remained unruptured possibly since the last 150 years. This depth is a natural candidate for the next strong Vrancea event.

All events occur in a compressive regime with thrust tectonics at intermediate depth. The fault plane solutions of the instrumentally recorded large earthquakes are remarkably similar. They typically strike SW-NE (~ 220°) and dip 60° to 70° to the NW. The slip angle is roughly 90°. The similarity of the fault plane solutions is strongly contrasting with significant variations of the radiation patterns which reflect the dynamics of the rupture process. The intensively studied 1977 event (Müller et al., 1978, Rökers and Müller, 1982) is characterized by a sequence of shocks that propagated to the SW, enhancing radiation in this direction. In agreement with this seismological result the damage was more severe to the SW of Vrancea as compared to the NE. This contrasts the damage pattern of the stronger 1940 event which caused less damage in Bucharest than the weaker 1977 earthquake.

The frequency of Vrancea events can be assessed from available catalogues. Earthquakes with Richter magnitudes in excess of 6.0 taken from Radu's (1991) compilation covering this century and transformed to moment magnitudes with Oncescu's (1987) relation satisfy a Gutenberg/Richter law (Lungu and Coman, 1994):

log10N = 4.1 - 0.78 Mw (1)
with N as the number of events per year with magnitudes larger or equal to Mw. This provides recurrence times of 10 years for Mw > 6.5, 25 years for Mw > 7.0 and 50 years for Mw > 7.4. Historical data have been compiled by Radu (1974) and Purcaru (1979). Assuming that the data are complete for large magnitudes for the last 600 years, this time interval shows 3 earthquakes/century with Mw > 7.2 and 6 events/century with Mw > 6.8 in good agreement with the result based on relation (1).
An estimation of the seismic moment release rate (Mo) is a useful quantity to compare the level of seismic activity between different seismotectonic areas. The Gutenberg/Richter relation (1) and an assumed maximum possible magnitude of Mw = 8.0 result in Mo = 0.8·1019 Nm/yr. This represents the average amount of seismic moment per year released by Vrancea earthquakes and is proportional to the elastic energy release rate. Almost the same result is achieved if we add the seismic moments of the 4 last strong events (1940, 1977, 1986, 1990) which according to Oncescu and Bonjer (1997) amount to 7.5 ( 1020 Nm and divide it by a period of 100 years.
Table 1 compares the moment release rate of Vrancea with those of several active plate boundary regions (Jackson and McKenzie, 1988; Ward, 1994). The moment release rates of the Aegean and N-Anatolian Fault region exceed the Vrancea value by a factor of 3. However, the latter is comparable to Southern California and twice as high as values of the Zagros mountains and the Caucasus.


TABLE 1: Comparison of moment release rates for various tectonic active areas of the Mediterranean and the Middle East (after Jackson and McKenzie, 1988).

Region M0 in 1019 Nm/yr
Aegean 2.5
N-Anatolian Fault 2.3
Kopet Dag 1.5
Vrancea 1.0
Zagros 0.4
Caucasus 0.3


Moment release rates can be cast in strain rates with Kostrov's (1974) relation between moment and strain tensors. Taking the moment tensors of the last 4 large Vrancea earthquakes (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997), a source volume of 2.5·105 km³ (70×30×130 km) and a mantle shear modulus of 7.5·1010 Pa gives a strain rate of e = 2·10-7 yr-1 . With this strain rate the source volume is stretched in the vertical direction and shortened in NW-SE direction. Again this strain rate compares well with values from active plate boundaries such as Southern California (Ward, 1994; Fig. 3) where a similar amount of strain is observed by geodetic means. We elaborate this point in order to show that Vrancea seismicity, given its seismic moment release and associated strain rates, is at plate boundary scale. The estimated strain rate deforms a vertical slab with 130 km length by 2.6 cm/yr in vertical direction. Upscaling of this value to a geological times provides a value of 26 km vertical elongation in one million years.


Mantle Structure from Seismic Tomography

Several tomographic studies of the Vrancea zone have been conducted. Spakman et al. (1993) derived an image of the entire Mediterranean area including SE-Europe. This image reveals such important features as the phenomenon of slab detachment in the Tyrrhenian Sea (Wortel and Spakman, 1992). Weak indications of slab detachment are also visible for the Carpathian Arc. As standard ISC stations and data are used, the resolution of local features remains limited. Oncescu et al. (1984) inverted teleseismic events recorded by the Romanian earthquake network. A low-velocity structure could be identified between 40 and 80 km depth. The results of simultaneous inversion of hypocenters and P-wave velocities (Oncescu, 1984; Koch, 1985) indicate high-velocity material between 80 and 160 km depth, the level where intermediate depth seismicity is located. A recent attempt by Fan et al. (1998) with a larger set of regional earthquakes and records confirms that the intermediate depth seismogenic volume is characterized by high velocities.

Lorenz et al.(1997) restricted the input data used for inversion of teleseismic tomography to those stations of the Romanian network with digital recording. Though the number of stations are thus reduced as compared to Oncescu et al. (1984) the results are more significant due the improved data quality. Figure 3 shows depth levels of 74 to 112 km (Fig. 3a), 112 to 152 km (Fig. 3b), and 152 to 194 km (Fig. 3c). Each panel contains the sites of digital stations as triangles. The hypocenters of small earthquakes as observed during 1980 and 1994 are marked as dots and the sites of the large events between 1940 and 1990 as crosses. Both the pattern of stations and the azimuthal distribution of teleseismic earthquakes limit the volume that is illuminated by seismic rays and the resolution of the inversion. Given these constraints we consider the following features as significant:

The images show blocks of low velocities (- 4%), which surround an area of higher velocity (+ 4%) The high velocities extend from a subcrustal depth of 40 km all the way down to the maximum depth of 236 km mapped during inversion. The recent inversion of local events (Fan et al., 1998) shows results consistent with this observation. At intermediate depth the elevated velocities appear only beneath Vrancea. All intermediate depth earthquakes are contained in the high-velocity volume. It appears that the seismogenic volume is significantly smaller as compared to the high-velocity volume. The earthquakes occupy a small strip within the high-velocity body that tends from the NE at a level around 90 km (Fig. 3a) to the SW at the level where the deepest earthquakes are observed. It is also noteworthy that no specific velocity structure within the limits of resolution characterizes the depth level of very low seismicity (40 to 70 km) and the depths below the deepest events. On a global scale all images of active subduction zones are characterized by positive P-wave velocity anomalies. We take this as strong evidence for the presence of a slab of oceanic lithosphere beneath Vrancea. The volume of elevated velocities displays a peculiar structure, the main feature of which is a change of strike from top to bottom. The uppermost high velocity material has a strike direction roughly SW-NE. This is consistent with a NW-ward subduction. The deeper portions of the high-velocity material, however, are oriented S-N. This direction is close to the current strike of the Eastern Carpathians. Presumably this is also the strike direction of subduction before the last segment of lithosphere - the Vrancea segment - was incorporated into the mantle. Thus the directional change of subduction during the last phases of collision in the Eastern Carpathians is preserved in the tomographic image. The S-N oriented high-velocity material represents older W-ward subducted material that is detached from the foreland lithosphere but still attached to the SW-NE trending Vrancea slab. This additional portion of heavy oceanic lithosphere generates a pull-down force which will increase shear stresses in this passive slab.


4. Stress Field in a Passive Slab

Geological evidence suggests that active subduction around the Carpathian arc ceased about 10 Million years ago. When subduction came to a halt the slab steepened to an almost vertical position. Thus the simplest model to estimate the stress field within this chunk of lithosphere is a rectangular block of high-density material (rho(s)), attached to a rigid layer that may represent the effective elastic lithosphere underlain by a low-density (rho(m)) mantle. The horizontal stress (rho(h)) equals the lithostatic pressure of the surrounding mantle, whereas the vertical stress (sigma(v)) equals the lithostatic pressure within the slab reduced by the buoyancy effect:

sigma(h) = rho(m)·g·z (2a)
sigma(v) = rho(s)·g·z - (rho(s)- rho(m))·g·L (2b)

with a total slab length L, gravitational acceleration g and depth z. Within the slab the stress field changes from tensile at shallow depth z < L. (rho(s)-rho(m))/rho(s) to compressive at deeper levels. As this model is rather crude for shallow levels we focus on those depths that are relevant to intermediate seismicity. With (m = 3200 kg/m³, (s = 3400 kg/m³, g = 10 m/s² and L = 200 km the stresses are compressive below 12 km depth. The buoyancy effect amounts to 0.4 GPa, so that the maximum differential stress decreases from 0.4 GPa to zero at the lower end of the slab where lithostatic conditions prevail. Thus this simple model is consistent with the stress field suggested by the fault plane solutions. However, the maximum possible shear stress remains on a fairly low level at the seismogenic depths between 70 (260 MPa) and 200 km (no shear stress). If we assume that the seismogenic volume differs from the high-density volume such that there are parts of the slab that extend below the deepest level of seismicity more realistic parameters apply. With an additional 150 km of non-seismic slab the level of maximum possible shear stress exceeds 300 MPa everywhere within the seismogenic volume. Although the frictional strength of rocks under very high confining pressure (5 GPa) are not known, estimates of lithosphere strength using plate bending geometry (Goetze and Evans, 1979) indicate that this level of shear stress may be sufficient to rupture oceanic lithosphere.


5. Implications for Hazard Assessment

Understanding the tectonics of the Vrancea earthquakes is mandatory for improving hazard assessment. The sequence of large events with their specific distribution of rupture areas has been shown in Figure 2. It is tempting to suggest that the next strong event would rupture the depth level around 120 km. However, this argument implicitly uses the model of a fault consisting of various segments that break one after another. For large strike slip faults such as the San Andreas or the North Anatolian fault this seems to be true and has been utilized for hazard assessment. The essential idea is that the probability that a segment of the fault breaks is dependent upon the last time it ruptured. This is a deviation from the standard assumption of earthquake occurrence, which assumes a Poisson distribution of the events within a given time interval. A Poisson statistics is justified if the events are independent. The probability of occurrence of an earthquake between now and a given time in the future is then independent on the previous seismic history. For a large seismogenic area this may be a viable assumption. It has been questioned, however, for specific faults, whose magnitude distribution deviates from the standard Gutenberg/Richter law and can be better described by characteristic earthquakes. If the high-velocity material is interpreted as the volume within which brittle failure could occur, the spatial extent of this volume simultaneously limits the maximum size of earthquakes. Wells and Coppersmith (1994) developed an empirical relation between moment magnitude and the size of the fault plane

Mw = 4.07 + 0.98·log10A (3)

with rupture area A in km². The variance of Mw in this estimate amounts to ( = 0.24. A comparison of observed values of A (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997) and those derived from relation (3) compare favorably (Table 1), so that (3) can be applied to large Vrancea earthquakes. Table 2 shows the prediction of fault plane sizes and their linear dimension (A½) taken as square root. Obviously an event with magnitude Mw = 8.5 would not fit onto the high-velocity volume, so that tomography suggests that the maximum possible earthquake is in the range of Mw = 8.0

TABLE 2: Magnitude (Mw) versus rupture area (A in km²) according to observations of the large Vrancea events (Oncescu and Bonjer, 1997) compared with the areas predicted by the empirical relation (3). A½ is the square root of the area and represents the scale of the linear dimension of the ruptured area.

year Mw A (observed) A (W&C) A½ (W&C)
1940 7.7 2500 3300 57
1977 7.4 2000 1750 42
1986 7.1 725 930 30
1990 6.9 300 610 25


TABLE 3. Rupture areas (A in km²) and their linear dimensions (A½ in km) are predicted by the empirical relation (3) for large moment magnitudes (Mw).

Mw A A½
7.5 2200 50
8.0 6200 80
8.5 18600 140


6. Conclusions

The intermediate depth of Vrancea seismicity is characterized by a seismic moment release rate of 0.8·1019 Nm/yr and a strain rate of 2·10-7 yr-1. These values are comparable with data from Southern California and indicate that energy release and deformation are of plate boundary scale. Previous and recent seismic tomography show that the seismicity is confined to a high-velocity region of the mantle. Both facts together are taken as evidence that seismicity is related to oceanic subduction. As active subduction ceased several million years ago the ongoing process of upper mantle deformation must be controlled by post-collisional slab dynamics such as slab segmentation and detachment. The seismologically observed stress field within the seismogenic zone is consistent with these considerations.


References

Davies, J. H., and von Blanckenburg, F. (1995): Slab breakoff: A model of lithosphere detachment and its test in the magmatism and deformation of collisional orogens, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 129, 85-102.
Fan, G., Wallace, T.C., and Zhao, D. (1998): Tomographic imaging of deep velocity structure beneath the Eastern and Southern Carpathians, Romania: implications for continental collision, J. Geophys. Res. 103(B2), 2701-2723.
Goetze, Ch., and Evans, B. (1979): Stress and temperature in the bending lithosphere as constrained by experimental rock mechanics, Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 59, 463-478.
Jackson, J., and McKenzie, D. (1988): The relationship between plate motion and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East, Geophysical Journal 93, 45-73.
Jiricek, R. (1979): Tectonic development of the Carpathian arc in the Oligocene and Neogene, in: M. Mahel (ed.), Tectonic Profiles through the Western Carpathians, Geol. Inst. Dionyz Stur, Bratislava, 205-214.
Koch, M. (1985): Nonlinear inversion of local seismic travel times for the simultaneous determination of the 3D-velocity structure and hypocentres - application to the seismic zone Vrancea, J. Geophys. 56, 160-173.
Kostrov, V (1974): Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and seismic flow of rocks, Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys., Solid Earth 1, 23-44.
Lorenz, F.P., Wenzel, F., and Popa, M. (1997): Teleseismic travel-time tomography of the compressional-wave velocity structure in the Vrancea zone, Romania, Abstract, AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, USA.
Lungu, A., and Coman, O. (1994): Experience database of Romanian facilities subjected to the last three Vrancea earthquakes. Part I: Probabilistic hazard analysis to the Vrancea earthquakes in Romania, Research Report for the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Contract No. 8223/EN.
Müller, G., Bonjer, K.-P., Stöckl, H., and Enescu, D. (1978): The Romanian earthquake of March 4, 1997. I. Rupture process inferred from fault-plane solutions and multiple-event analysis, J. Geophys. 44, 203-218.
Oncescu, M.C. (1984): Deep structure of Vrancea region, Romania, inferred from simultaneous inversion for hypocenters and 3-D velocity structure, Ann. Geophys. 2, 23-28.
Oncescu, M.C. (1987): On the magnitude and depth recurrence of Vrancea earthquakes, Report ICEFIZ EP-34-1987, 20 p. (in Romanian).
Oncescu, M.C., Bulacu, V., Anghel, M., and Smalbergher, V. (1984): Three-dimensional P-wave velocity image under the Carpathian Arc, Tectonophysics 106, 305-319.
Oncescu, M.C., and Bonjer, K.-P. (1997): A note on the depth recurrence and strain release of large Vrancea earthquakes, Tectonophysics 272, 2-4, 291-302.
Oncescu, M.C., Marza, I.V., Rizescu, M., and Popa, M. (1998): The Romanian earthquake catalogue between 984-1996, this volume.
Purcaru, G. (1979): The Vrancea, Romania, earthquake of March 4, 1977 - a quite successful prediction, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 18, 274-287.
Radu, C. (1974): Contribution à l'étude de la séismicité de la Roumanie et comparaison avec la séismicité de sud-est de la France, Ph.D.-thesis, Université de Strasbourg, 404p.
Radu, C. (1991): Strong earthquakes occurred on the Romanian territory in the period 1901-1990, Vitralii 3, 12-13 (in Romanian).
Rökers, E., and Müller, G. (1982): The Romanian earthquake of March 4, 1977. III. Improved focal model and moment determination, J. Geophys. 50, 143-150.
Royden, L. (1988): Late Cenozoic tectonics of the Pannonian basin system, Tectonics 12, 2, 303-325.
Spakman, W., van der Lee, S., and van der Hilst, R. (1993): Travel-time tomography of the European-Mediterranean mantle down to 1400 km, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 79, 3-14.
Sperner, B. (1996): Computer programs for the kinematic analysis of brittle deformation structures and the Tertiary tectonic evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia), Tübinger Geowiss. Arbeiten A 27, 120p.
Tavera, I. (1991): Etude des mecanismes focaux de gros seismes et sismicité dans la region de Vrancea-Romania. Raport stage DEA de geophysique interne, Institut de Physique du Globe, Université de Paris 7, 53p.
Ward, S.N. (1994): A multidisciplinary approach to seismic hazard in Southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. America 84, 5, 1293-1309.
Wells, D.L., and Coppersmith, K.J. (1994): New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc America 84, 4, 974-1002.
Wortel, M.J.R., and Spakman, W. (1992): Structure and dynamics of subducted lithosphere in the Mediterranean region, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. v. Wetensch. 95, 3, 325-347.

Figures: (müssen in den Text integriert werden)

  1. Figure 1. Topographic map of Romania with intermediate depth seismicity (> 60 km) of this century (for details see Oncescu et al., this volume).
  2. Figure 2. Depth and magnitude of the last 4 large Vrancea earthquakes.
  3. Figure 3. Horizontal slices of upper mantle between 74 km and 194 km depth of the Vrancea area. Note that all recorded seismicity (dots and crosses) is confined to the high-velocity areas.


M. Pohl, Feb 19, 1999